SHE DID

IT'S CALLED "CATALYST"

OH NO WAIT IT'S A SERIES oh god

Barque cats - for those who didn't spend middle-school reading horrible science fiction novels about the love lives of space psychics - are large, intelligent telepathic cats who enjoy being in zero gravity and can warn you when there's a problem with your spaceship. I totally wanted one when I was twelve, though I unfortunately didn't have any zero gravity to keep it in.

This sentence is in the synopsis:

When corrupt government officials declare a plague and plan to destroy animals across the galaxy, including the Barque Cats, two young people (a veterinarian and a cat person), a clever Barque kitten and the boy who is its special person, an ancient Egyptian cat with mysterious powers and a hidden agenda, and a con man join forces to try to prevent the tragedy.

You know, I don't think that's a sufficiently rag-tag band of rebels. We still need, like, a disillusioned ex-cop with a drinking problem, a quick-witted halfling thief, a robot who wants to learn to love, and the Doctor. Get with the program, McCaffrey.

Actually, sorry - Elizabeth Ann Scarborough's name's on there as co-writer. Given McCaffrey's recent health problems, Scarborough may be the actual author of this excellent work. Especially considering the whole "an ancient Egyptian cat with mysterious powers and a hidden agenda" business. That is a very Scarborough kind of idea. Also, this is the sequel (which is called Catacombs):

The barque cats, mistaken for a public health hazard, flee Earth for the feline-dominated planet, Mau, with the help of Pshaw-Ra, a mysterious cat with his own spaceship. Oddly, no one--including the humans--is bothered that he plans to take over the universe on behalf of felinekind.

Yeah, I see the invisible hand of the Scarborough in that storyline. It sounds like it might actually attempt humor, a property which McCaffrey has always scorned.

...I admit at this point that I'm kind of thinking about reading these.
The people of the icy planet Brakrath depend on the barohnas, a race of powerful psychics/witches/somethings, to bring the summer by melting the snow with their sunstones. Barohnas are long-lived and produce many daughters, one at a time; each one, when she is old enough, goes into the mountain with a spear and finds a beast to kill. If she kills her beast and survives, she will go through a physical transformation to become a barohna herself, depriving her mother of her power and taking it on for herself.

Most of a barohna's daughters die. Khira is the last daughter of the bahrona Tiahna, and is convinced that she will fail just like all of her sisters. Left alone in her mother's hall alone after her last sister's death, she finds a beautiful amnesiac boy abandoned in the cold by the crew of some spaceship. Feeling isolated and resentful of her own people, she decides that he'll keep her company for the winter; she names him Darkchild and alternately pampers him and harasses him. But Darkchild is controlled by a manipulative internal presence called a guide, and he becomes aware long before she does that he poses a threat to her.

Khira is very prickly, proud, and humorless; she thinks she has nothing in common with her mother, but the main difference I see between them is that Tiahna has mastered sarcasm. I assume it's like those abilities Pokemon can only learn after they've evolved to their final form. Khira's a refreshingly mean heroine.

Darkchild, on the other hand, is supernaturally pure; he actually makes friends with a unicorn at one point. (Well, you know, a space unicorn.) His guide, fretful and anal-retentive, is a more interesting character. Their dynamic makes more sense as it becomes clear that cut for minor spoilers ) This probably isn't the first ever instance of this plot device, but I think it's the earliest I've seen - the book came out in 1983.

The writing tends towards the purple, but never in a way that made me laugh at it; Brakrath's mythology feels sturdy even where it's not fully explained. van Scyoc clearly knew the rest of the story. Another place where the book is good is its generally unsentimental portrayal of Khira - she's frequently cruel or thoughtless, but still clearly admirable. The book forms a tidy emotional arc in itself, but some plot elements are left hanging. It's the first in a three-book series, and I clearly need to get the others. Apparently the second part of a barohna's life cycle involves soul-bonded lesbian lovers from whom they draw their power.
I'm re-reading Watcher's Mask - which I like - and a few years ago I read Delan the Mislaid - which I didn't. And it occurred to me that man, Marks's earlier stuff was way grimmer than the Elemental Logic series. And it's not like Elemental Logic is exactly unicorns and fluffy bunnies and Mercedes Lackey when she's not being edited! It doesn't approach Carol Berg or Susan R. Matthews levels of cruelty, but there are definitely places where it creeps up on Barbara Hambly.

Whereas I think Watcher's Mask actually shoots past Berg. (Matthews still reigns as champion.) Maybe something happened just before Fire Logic? Or maybe I should read Dancing Jack to confirm that the shift didn't happen somewhere in there.

-

In an unrelated literary mystery, I've read four-and-a-half of her books now, and at this point I've got to admit that I just don't get C. J. Cherryh. She always seems to have a clear picture of where she wants to go with a book, and I think she gets there - but I rarely have any idea what she found compelling about the locale. It's similar to my reaction to Akihabara.

The half-a-book is Regenesis, which I'm reading now. If it were any other writer, I'd be beginning to suspect that our protagonists would be safer if they read more fiction and knew how to recognize the villain. Since it's Cherryh, I've got no idea what the hell she's doing. Maybe the whole cast'll turn into bats next chapter. There'll be some obvious thematic reason for it.
This is not an original observation, but: In terms of worldview, at least, Rex Stout was a way nicer person than Agatha Christie. Archie and Wolfe were both kind of jerks sometimes, and Archie racist, but the sorts of stories he told make it clear that Stout himself was aware that women and black people were, you know, people. (I don't know about other ethnicities; I think there was a Hispanic guy who was skeevy once? Otherwise, non-existent.)

Christie, I don't know! She was pretty okay with women who were, like, virgins. Or old and meddling. The others seem to have presented some kind of problem. I think she thought people who weren't white and English were probably off eating babies and carrying on about something, and should be left to that, elsewhere.

If mysteries are fantasies of justice - I think that that is generally a fair statement - then there's still a lot of room for variation when you get down to the author's idea of what justice is. The Wolfe books are rarely particularly interested in punishment for their villains; that stuff gets, like, one paragraph at the end, if that much. (The major exception I've run into so far being the Arnold Zeck arc, which is about revenge, and feels extremely unlike the rest of the series.) There's the scene where everyone lines up in Wolfe's office and Wolfe verbally takes the villain apart, and then it's on to presents. Because what the books are really interested in is comfort for the victims. Large piles of money, the removal of romantic barriers, the awarding of desired careers and living situations, and emotional validation from authority figures - mainly Wolfe himself, Cramer, and various rich old white businessmen.

(Not really any politicians or lawyers getting to act as the authority figure, I think? Stout kinda treated successful entrepreneur guys with ethics the way some fantasy writers treat Good Kings/Queens - as possessing great moral authority and great potential for being betrayed. - I unfortunately think the female equivalent here is generally the entrepreneur's wife, and I can only think of one instance of that one off-hand. There was a brilliant Machiavellian executive assistant once, who basically pushed every single one of my narrative buttons; but she ended up getting murdered and having to metaphorically come back and haunt everyone to achieve her goals.)

Anyway, I find these books pleasant to read because this aligns closely with my own personal sense of justice. Maybe I would feel differently if anyone had ever messed with me in a really serious way, but while I see the appeal of punishment, I don't see that I have the right to insist upon it. Honestly, I hope someone would stop me from doing so if I were far enough gone to change my mind about that; I don't want to wake up some day with the knowledge that someone's dead because I pushed for the death penalty for them.

Remedy for past harm and prevention of future harm are the goals; if the remedy (say, money) and the prevention (say, jail time, or a large enough sum of money to make anyone else think twice about whatever it was) cause pain to the person who caused the harm in the first case, then as long as that pain is not disproportionate to the harm, then that's fine. But pain for its own sake is revenge rather than justice. It doesn't strike me as a good goal.

(This from someone who's read nearly everything that Anne McCaffrey, master of Inhumane Wish Fulfillment, wrote before 2000. I'm confused myself. Maybe I just overdosed?)

Unrelatedly, I've been back at work two days and am already exhausted. Two days because I had to skip yesterday due to an extremely stupid decision to try to climb a set of stairs up the hill at the park in one go. As of today, upon application of muscle relaxants and heating pads, I can again stand up and sit down without undue difficulty. I even climbed a small set of four stairs today, though I did it sideways and leaning on the banister after the first time. There was a period last fall when I was climbing that hill almost every day. Apparently sitting around doing nothing for three weeks has consequences on your muscles!
I've been looking through my recent stats, and I see that a lot of people are getting here by way of search queries my blog can't really answer. I thought I would help out the people who have been getting here by searching for things like this:

in the adoration of jenna fox what is her character traits
the adoration of jenna fox character names
what happens in the adoration of jenna fox
what is the author's intent and purpose with the story of jenna fox
who is the protagonist in the adoration of jenna fox
the adoration of jenna fox yahoo ans


You should really read the book before writing your paper, but here you go:

Jenna Fox's character traits are perkiness, laziness, punctuality, and spontaneous human combustion. The other characters include her parents, Rob and Judy; her grandmother, Kanna; her eccentric next-door neighbor, the artist Theo Janssen; and her brooding love interest, Damian, who turns out to be a vampire. The story is about Jenna learning that she is an evil robot replica and trying to come to terms with the fact that she was manufactured to spy on humanity in advance of the approaching "machine revolution." The author's intent and purpose is to instill a sense of self-doubt and confusion in her readers. The protagonist is Jenna Fox.

Don't go to Yahoo! Answers, by the way; it's not usually very reliable.
The Kindly Ones, by Melissa Scott

On the planets of Orestes and Electra, certain social crimes are punishable by "death" - the criminals are declared ghosts, and the "living" cannot speak to them or even acknowledge their existence. Only specially-licensed mediums can speak to both the living and the dead.

Trey Maturin is a medium from off-planet, a former actor occasionally undone by a penchant for the dramatic, working for the most powerful family on Orestes - who hate actors. Trey is simultaneously drawn to the beauty of Orestes' theatre and disgusted by the brutality of its customs. The "disgusted by" side gets kind of a boost when the family in question goes to war with two others over a pointless duel fought by two spoiled twenty-somethings. When things go too far, Trey is forced to pick up the pieces with the help of two space pilots - Leith, a former soldier from off-world, and Guil, an Oresteian woman who has declared herself "para'anin," or neutral and without family - and Rehur, former heir to Trey's employer, who chose to become a ghost to dedicate his life to acting.

This is an interesting concept and cast of characters trapped in a bog of unnecessary exposition. It's not a long book, but probably thirty to forty percent of the text consists of explanations of one aspect or another of Oresteian society or of piloting spaceships. This wouldn't be such a terrible thing if most of these details weren't irrelevant to the story. In the first chapter, Leith asks a number of questions about Guil's past. By the end of the book, none of them have been answered - but we are extremely well-informed about the Oresteian equivalent of dogsled racing. (They use alien polar bears in heat, and sometimes people die.)

Scott's book Shadow Man, about a society with five genders trying desperately to pretend there are only two, is very explicitly about sexuality and its social construction. Her strategy with The Kindly Ones is the opposite. If you weren't alert to the possibility, you could easily miss the fact that Leith and Guil are lovers until the last chapter. You could make it through the whole book without realizing that Trey - I'm hiding this, though it's a spoiler-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder - is never explicitly identified as male or female. In fact, this reviewer did so!

It's interesting that she was able to do that so smoothly, and I appreciate that this book came out in '87, when standards were different. But since it doesn't serve much narrative purpose, I'd have preferred that Scott be less coy about this stuff.

Fair Play, by Tove Jansson

Conversation with [personal profile] thegeekgene, from whom I kind of stole the book:

[personal profile] thegeekgene: I just read this book by Tove Jansson.

Me: Is it about being moody lesbians by the sea?

[personal profile] thegeekgene: They're on an island.

This book is about how art is tortuous and sometimes it's an exercise in futility and it drives the people around you crazy. And how relationships are basically the same. Also, islands, old age, and boats. It's pretty funny. It's partially autobiographical - Jansson and her partner Tuulikki Pietilä did, indeed, create a little artists' colony for themselves on an island.

Jansson is best known for the Moomins books, a series of children's books about a little hippo-looking creature called Moomintroll. The books are astonishingly sweet and poignant, focused on the changing of the seasons, loss, disaster, and the all-powerful nature of mothers. The funny thing about this book is that it's so much like the Moomins books. You kind of get the feeling that they were also somehow autobiographical.

Though the book feels light for the most part, there are dark depths to it. But interestingly, it doesn't feel anywhere near as heavy as the two last Moomins books chronologically, Moominpapa at Sea and Moominvalley in November. The former of these was about death and despair, and the latter was a self-critical examination of Jansson's relationship with her fans, her characters, and her mother. MiN is possibly the most metatextual narrative I've ever encountered. Jansson'd had twenty-five years of writing about Moomins to build up a cosmology, and she clearly felt the weight of it on her, and chose to make use of it as she ended the series. Fair Play, written another twenty years later, long after Jansson had shed the burden of all that context, is gentler and less disturbing.
A Drunken Dream and Other Stories, by Moto Hagio

In Two Sentences Or Less: Mostly a little slight. Hagio's better in long form.

The Long Version: The best things in this collection are Hanshin, a deeply professional punch in the stomach, and Matt Thorn's interview with Hagio. Interestingly, these are also the only things in the book to have been previously published in English.

That's not to say that the book's not worth buying, because it is, but it's hard not compare this stuff to her longer work. The ones that stood out most to me:

Iguana Girl - Vivid, disturbing, and obvious in a way that can't diminish the former qualities.

A Drunken Dream - Needed to be twenty pages longer to escape feeling like cheating.

Girl on Porch With Puppy - Hah.

The Child Who Comes Home - In places, a little lazy; in others, a genuinely affecting depiction of grief.

The Willow Tree - I'm unclear why she bothered to write this, and then, having written it, publish it. Did a friend ask her for a short story of a really specific page-length, and this was what she had lying around?

...this comes off as quite negative! Sorry about that, that's not really the intention. But I really don't think another short story collection was the way to reintroduce Hagio to the west. It's been tried before, if in a very different publishing climate for manga, but part of the problem really is that her longer works are much stronger. I am open to argument over exactly what should've been first, but I argue in favor of The Poe Clan, with Heart of Thomas as the runner-up.

(I'd suggest Marginal, except that my feeling is that that visual style doesn't go over well in the North American market - for some reason it actually feels more dated than the two older works on first glance. On the other hand, Heart of Thomas does have those old-school tone shifts - like Eric's fit here - that I think might throw people who read mainly modern manga. Those things are signalled very differently now than they were once-upon-a-time; there's this really specific architecture of panel flow, and I think there are federal statutes regulating line thickness for superdeform-style and goofy heads. I hear Sakura Kinoshita spent a couple days in jail over volume two of Matantei Loki. The prophesied second coming of Osamu Tezuka will probably be brought to an abrupt end by a stoning prompted by an unorthodox use of diagonal gutters.)

tactics 8, by Kazuko Higashiyama and Sakura Kinoshita

In Two Sentences Or Less: In Which The Mangaka Continue Their Tradition Of Cutting Away To Cheap Jokes Every Time The Story Appears To Be Going Somewhere.

The Long Version: The first chapter is the finale of the plotline from the last volume, which went much deeper into the dysfunctional nature of Kantarou and Haruka's relationship than any of the previous storylines had. The rest of the volume, naturally, consists of comedy one-offs.

Not that they're bad comedy one-offs, for the most part! But it's getting to be obvious that this is something Higashiyama and Kinoshita do when they feel in over their heads. I think that they do know where the plot's going, but that they're uncomfortable with it and aren't in a hurry to get there.

The Princess and the Hound, by Mette Ivie Harrison

In Two Sentences Or Less: Too much manpain, not enough Princess. Or hound.

The Long Version: I think that actually was the long version.

Well, I'll say this much - [personal profile] rushthatspeaks is right in comparing this to Robin McKinley, because the tone is very like hers. The problem is that Harrison isn't willing to put the kind of weight on the story which McKinley-style prose is designed to hold. The actual conflict here is very minor, because the characters who would be ripping each other's hearts out in a McKinley book are too restrained to do it here. Things feel too easy, and when I got to the end I thought - "what, that's it?"

Fire Dancer, by Ann Maxwell

In Two Sentences Or Less: Man, why the hell isn't more sci-fi like this? And by "like this," I of course mean "completely insane."

The Long Version: I'm actually just going to quote [personal profile] oyceter here:

I laughed every time I encountered "Kirtn," which I unfortunately pronounce as "curtain." I also giggled over his furry virile manliness and his sexual frustration. Also! There are talking rocks! And there is a species that is so foreign that they forgo apostrophes for slashes! I kid you not, they are called the J/taal. Rheba knows nothing about sex, given that her planet exploded before she could learn.


I ask you - what is not to like?
I'm halfway through Jaran and maybe thirty pages into Cold Magic right now*, and I think I've pinned down why Elliott's Crown of Stars manages to be so wrenching. It's because Elliott's base narrative, the one that comes to her organically, is one in which people respect each other, enemies treat each other fairly, most people are pretty okay, and pretty okay is probably good enough to keep the world sane. There are situations in Jaran which, in almost any other book, would be a source of constant tension between the protagonists, but Elliott sails past them or cuts them out, because the story she wants to tell there is about people who can get along and apologize when they hurt each other's feelings.

A lot of the conflicts in Crown of Stars are very basic fantasy-novel things - unsuitable heir to the throne, star-crossed romance, evil wizard enslaves a girl. There are writers who deal with this stuff very neatly, like laying cookies in a pan. For Elliott, though, it's viscerally wrong - people who love each other are hurting each other! They're acting stupid! I think she doesn't like it, and that comes through. It's unusually humane.


* Reading five books at a time is healthy. It means I'm... flexible.
I just read City of Diamond, and it was really good, and it ended on a cliffhanger, and the internet informs me that she will not be writing a sequel. So now I'm all grumpy.
Someone sent me this text earlier in the year. I guess I can just be assumed to know such things.

My answer was as follows. (By email.)


In response to to your text, I regret to inform you that the only perfect match to your request I can think of is Kushiel's Dart, by Jacqueline Carey.

Other possible matches below. Stuff that I recommend has an asterisk.

(It's sad that I can compile a list like this so quickly.)

No Lesbians )

Contains Lesbians )

Manga )

I was later told that this request had been made on behalf of a friend who was really into Nalini Singh. So I am, like, the go-to person for when you've got a bored Nalini Singh fan on your hands. I fear for my future.
My definition of "Dragonriders fanfic" here being "fiction wherein people somehow mentally bond with dragons." That I can think of:

His Majesty's Dragon series, by Naomi Novik
Dragon's Blood series, by Jane Yolen
Havemercy series, by Jaida Jones and Danielle Bennett
A Song of Ice and Fire series, by George RR Martin
The Dragon Prince series, by Melanie Rawn
Guards! Guards!, by Terry Pratchett. Plus a Rincewind short story, which I’m not sure I want to count, because I remember it as being an explicit parody of Dragonriders.

Mercedes Lackey gets an honorary award for writing the series about people who magically bond with most things - horses, swords, other people, trees, their hats, the internet - but never actually with dragons.

I note that only the first two of these could, as Dragonriders generally is, be classified as sci-fi; the rest are straight fantasy. Clearly this is unbalanced. My soulbonded dragon book will be some sort of dystopian cyberpunk future thing.
Spoilers for all four books under the cuts.

1) Though each of these books, taken individually, is hopeful in tone, taken together they're extremely ominous.

Cut for spoilers. )

I can't see how this series can possibly keep maintaining the tone it has for much longer without damaging its plausibility. This world is just too screwed.

2) Another alarming pattern: spoilers )

3) Regarding the wizards: They actually kind of suck. )

4) My prediction regarding Slado: HE'S CLOW REED )
If you're writing a book about a bunch of Japanese people who are into putting themselves into cryonic suspension for generations at a time - how do you get through it without anyone ever mentioning Urashima Taro? How is that even possible?

(If you don't know who he is, here. The story's like Snow White in Japan - every single person in the country knows it by heart, there are picture-book versions in every grade-school classroom, and it's been retold in kids' and adults' stories of varying levels of metatextuality thousands of times.

...Actually, I'm surprised that Bujold missed it, because one of those retellings was Ursula K. LeGuin's A Fisherman of the Inland Sea, which covers some similar subject matter. Not that, when you re-work a sci-fi concept, you need to read every single re-working that came preceded yours - I just thought that a lot of Anglophone nerds had read this one in particular.)

Cryoburn

Oct. 30th, 2010 10:36 pm
1. Bujold does not know how Japanese names and honorifics work. This is very jarring, because I do know.

2. I don't think that crisis midway through actually made sense. I feel like all Miles' research would have turned up some photographs at some point.

3. That was an EXTREMELY sudden romance.

4. AGH VERY LAST SENTENCE
JD Robb is the name that romance author Nora Roberts uses for her In Death books, which are a mystery/romance/sci-fi series, in roughly that order of precedence. A summary of the series as a whole:

Eve Dallas is a police detective in a Poorly-Conceived-Future where there is intergalactic space travel, everyone has flying cars, people routinely live to 150, and widespread environmental devastation does not seem to have had much effect on New York City. Forensic technology appears to be stuck in the mid-90s, and the war on drugs continues, unexamined, to take up most of the justice system's time and money. Also, every two months on the dot there's a new serial killer who targets mainly attractive women, which suggests some possible slippage backwards.

Eve is ruthless, brilliant, and has an strong code of personal honor. She was also sexually abused as a child, and is suffering from PTSD, for which she refuses to go into treatment. She is always the one to investigate these serial killer cases, which I think demonstrates a certain lack of forethought on her superiors' parts. Fortunately, her relationship with Roarke (no last name), the handsomest ethically-challenged billionaire industrialist in the whole world, is helping her heal.

Eve and Roarke are an extremely cute couple, which is good, because there are a lot of scenes of the two of them bouncing off each other. These books are very enjoyable to read, frequently funny, and unbelievably predictable. You can usually identify the murderer from his or her first or second appearance, occasionally just his or her first vague mention. Half the time Eve does so, but she always ends up getting cornered and monologued at anyway.

Every investigation goes pretty much the same way - Eve reluctantly uses Roarke's unsavory technology or connections to solve the case; people sexually harass her and she mocks them in a hard-assed manner; Roarke and Eve render themselves vulnerable talking about their tragic pasts, and then have explicit sex; Roarke's butler shows up to act snobby, and Eve's reformed pickpocket friend shows up to act eccentric and lovable. Etc. So far this is still all pretty entertaining.

Book 1 - Naked in Death

Detective Eve Dallas's ruthlessness, brilliance, and strong code of personal honor have gained her a reputation for being the best detective in Poorly-Conceived-Future-New York. And that is why she is sleeping with Roarke, the primary suspect in the serial killer case. Robb makes this work on an emotional level, but it's not plausible on a plot level.

How Quickly Is The Murderer Identifiable?: (I'm not going to put names or anything in the "How Quickly?" part of these reviews, but I'm spoiler-cutting just in case.) The first time he/she is briefly mentioned in conversation by another character, which happens within the first ten or twenty pages.

Does The Murderer Corner Eve And Monologue At Her?: (This part actually will contain spoilers.) Yup. He's waiting for her in her apartment.

Books 2-5 )
and Octavia Butler was completely insane.

I mean, the Xenogenesis series made this fairly clear, but this book contains every questionable decision Xenogenesis made multiplied by a factor of eight.

HeLa cells

Feb. 3rd, 2010 10:45 pm

There’s an interesting interview here (via Ta-Nehisi Coates) about an African-American woman named Henrietta Lacks whose cervical cancer cells were taken as samples in 1951, shortly before her death, and were found to reproduce in a culture so quickly and efficiently that they revolutionized research on human tissue. They called them HeLa cells, and her family knew nothing about it until twenty-five years later, when her daughter Deborah was contacted by researchers who were interested in getting a sample of her own cells.

There is no earthly way that Octavia Butler didn’t know about this when she was writing Dawn. The heroine with whom the frightening, inexplicable alien falls in love/lust mainly due to her body’s fascinating ability to develop tumors? I think that is what a metaphor looks like.

(Crossposted to SarahPin.com, Dreamwidth, and LiveJournal. You can leave comments at whichever.)

COMYN LORD: I am so angry and celibate! It has something to do with my psychic powers.

HIS DAD: Cry moar. You are going to be a warrior and awesome and give me millions of awesome grandchildren because I have inadequacy issues.

COMYN LORD: I hate you, father! I fantasize about killing you with such eerie vividness that I must flee the room to rest my burning forehead against the cool stones of the corridor wall, terrified by how near I have come to patricide this day.

HIS DAD: (That is normal on Darkover.)

COMYN LADY: HI I’M HERE FOR THE ARRANGED MARRIAGE

Read the rest of this entry » )

(Crossposted to SarahPin.com, Dreamwidth, and LiveJournal. You can leave comments at whichever.)

December 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
2345 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Style Credit

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 03:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags

Creative Commons



The contents of this blog and all comments I make are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License. I hope that name is long enough. I could add some stuff. It could also be a Bring Me A Sandwich License.

If you desire to thank me for the pretend internet magnanimity I show by sharing my important and serious thoughts with you, I accept pretend internet dollars (Bitcoins): 19BqFnAHNpSq8N2A1pafEGSqLv4B6ScstB