[personal profile] snarp
(Crossposted from Tumblr, which is the only place I'm posting/reading recently, sorry.)

here's an article about the revised ToS they released yesterday (April 4, 2017). You can read the current ToS in full here, and the previous one here. Basically, LiveJournal no longer permits political fundraising, and it's probably related to other recent efforts to mess up Putin's enemies' fundraising efforts.

So, that happened! And something else also happened, which that article doesn't mention:

9.2.6. The user may not, without the Administration's special permit, use automatic scripts (bots, crawlers etc.) to collect information from the Service and/or to interact with the Service;


...if they're actually serious about this - which seems unlikely - then this new ToS is a suicide note, because:

* This policy would remove LiveJournal from Google and other search engines' results. And yeah, it's really easy for them to make that happen - they could just alter their robots.txt file to reflect this bizarre new policy, and Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, etc would immediately automatically remove all results on *.livejournal.com domains.

* This policy would ban all third-party clients, including those which use the official LiveJournal API. (Which, in its current form, they'd probably have to get rid of.)

* This policy would ban all backup clients. LiveJournal doesn't have an official one, they're all third-party.

* If they're serious about it, and they edit robots.txt to reflect it, this policy would make the Wayback Machine's LiveJournal archives inaccessible. The Wayback Machine automatically blanks out all earlier archived material when robots.txt tells them to get lost.

...now, LJ does not at this point appear to have updated robots.txt, and the API does still seem to be in operation, and literally fucking hiding from Google seems a little too dumb even for them? So, I'm going to assume for the moment that they're not serious.

Nonetheless, the fact that they even put this line in there is alarming, because it indicates they're dumber than we thought!

So, I'd personally be extremely grateful if some people with a few spare terabytes of space would get copies of the Wayback Machine's LJ archives before my fucking heart gives out? That's a LOT of fucking data that could be lost if they're dumb enough to enforce this.

...how long has their HTTPS been broken, christ.
From:
Anonymous( )Anonymous This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID( )OpenID You can comment on this post while signed in with an account from many other sites, once you have confirmed your email address. Sign in using OpenID.
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org


 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Style Credit

Page generated Jun. 23rd, 2017 10:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags

Creative Commons



The contents of this blog and all comments I make are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License. I hope that name is long enough. I could add some stuff. It could also be a Bring Me A Sandwich License.

If you desire to thank me for the pretend internet magnanimity I show by sharing my important and serious thoughts with you, I accept pretend internet dollars (Bitcoins): 19BqFnAHNpSq8N2A1pafEGSqLv4B6ScstB